Jump to content

PLD

Members
  • Content count

    1,584
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by PLD


  1. To what end? Why are we not occupying South Africa?

    A fine question. IMHO, that is an issue we should address.

    Helping an old lady against a gang of thugs is admirable. Dusting her off, making sure she is okay to stand on her feet and sending on her way is still a heroic act. Staying in that neighborhood and trying to lower the crime rate so she never has to worry about being attacked ever again is a lesson in futility. Thats not my job.

    It is if the thugs are attacking her because you killed the police that protected her.

    Why does the US have to be the world's police? We are resented for it more often than not. Any country can study our model of democracy and is free to copy it.

    That is a legitimate debate. But it's not relevant to this situation. We are not talking about getting involved, or not getting involved. We are involved and you cannot unring the bell. Metaphorically speaking, our girlfriend is already pregnant and we're deciding to stay or walk away.

    Why does my brother have to be killed? Why does my son have to take up arms? I don't live in an occupied country.

    The debate over isolationism is a whole other thread.

    We have dismantled a serious threat to US security. I though thats what this whole war was about. That to me is what any international policing done by our country should be about. Do you wanna f*** with us? We will take you apart and guess what? We may not be there to put you back together again.

    Your memory of world history need polishing. Every time we invade and dismantle a country, the resulting chaos (and spoils) creates a breeding ground for tyranical dictators. It is precisely what happened in Germany twice and caused WWI and WWII. And it is precisely why we now spend billions rebulding countries we just finished bombing.

    We did dismantle a moderate threat to US security. To leave now will allow it to reform and truly make the whole effort a wasted one.

    Using your old lady analogy again, Phillip, suppose you were armed and shot one of the muggers, paralyzing him. Is it now your responsibility to look after his family indefinitely? Are you going to take the same stance and give a portion of your earnings to keep his family afloat? Are you going to send your son to his house to mow is grass.. paint his house?

    Since I have seen no plan that involves offering financial aid to the insurgents, I don't see how your example is relevant. BUT, if I rolled in and shot all the police which then allowed the muggers to attack and paralyze the old lady, then yes. I have a responsibility to her.


  2. we have already destroyed their military, police & infrastructure etc, Exactly!!!!!!!!!!!! Because of poor planning!!!!!!!!!! So we are all just suppose to stay with how our President is running things, stay the course. NO F'in way, why should we.

    Why should we? Because we are decent people. We started this, and we will

    Phillip your not one for welfare......But we'll be giving one side or the other in Iraq welfare for decades to come. I for one have never said get out tomorrow. But the Stay the course line ran out its time some time ago for me and I think the last election said that somewhat also.

    Ok, so you're not a cut& run guy, but rather a pull out slowly guy. What is your timetable for withdrawal? How do you propose to handle the imminent chaos that will result?

    Its not just cut & run liberals that voted the republicans out. Many republicans dont want us just to stay the course

    Re-read my posts very carefully. I NEVER said liberals, democrats, etc. The reps that wanna cut and run are just as cowardly as the dems.

    Cut & Run is about a good of a statement as Stay the Course. The republican that say these cute one liners are about as useless as the statements themselves.

    By that I assume you mean me. Ok, but let's clarify a few things. 1) I am NOT a republican. 2) Cut and Run is not a campaign slogan. Either we plan to finish what we started or we do not. Either we cut and run, or we stay the course.

    We and many that you would call cut & runners would stay and would like to finish the job. I didnt want us to go into Iraq when we did and I knew and said that back before we did go into Iraq. The nuts are running the asylum over there now, we are not, we have most our troops in Baghdad, just trying to keep a lid on, but even with all those troops there is TONS of violence every day and its getting worse, thats a course that we should not stay on

    I can't even address this propperly without getting into a long boring discourse about middle eastern affairs; But suffice it to say that the escalating chaos is being strategically engineered to encourage us to get out.

    I would support stayin but give us reason to stay, give us a winable plan, give us leadership, give us truth, not just words

    A reason to stay? Because we are not spineless pieces of s**t. We destroyed the place, we stay until they are back on their feet. Any other plan is the plan of men who's word is not worth the paper it is written on.

    A winnable plan? We have one. Stay until the Iraqi police/military forces can maintain law and order. What you want is not a plan, it is a timetable. And you don't fight wars on a schedule.

    Cut & Run LOL

    Why don't you take a few minutes and tell us what you plan is? Not what is wrong with my plan. Not what we have screwed up so far. Not how much better it could have been.

    What is your plan for fixing this situation and in what timeframe does that occur?


  3. To all you cut and run guys. I certainly hope that you never find your families life in hands of another who shares your viewpoint.

    You can try and justify a pullout however you want. Cost, death toll, majority vote, Bush lied, plan sucks, whatever. Even if GW Bush is the anti-christ himself, that doesn't change the fact that we have already destroyed their military, police, and infrastructure, etc. and walking now is leaving them behind to be slaughtered. And that is wrong...

    Sleep well knowning that you walked away and left the little old lady to die because you might get a black eye in the process...


  4. You know this whole thread has me completely disgusted with many of you. Are you really the type of people that would walk away from a gang of thugs beating up an old lady? Are you really so selfish that if you tried to help out and you started getting hurt, you would run away and leave her to fend for herself?

    For God's sake! We are the richest, most powerful, country in the history of the world. I have more food in my pantry than many whole villages on this dirtball, and more money in my pocket than 1/2 the worlds population makes in a year. I take more clothes to goodwill every year than most people will ever own, and burn enough fuel in a year to light up a small country. Even this computer I am typing on cost more than many people make in a lifetime.

    How can you people sit at dinner and ask God to bless your meal knowing that you will throw away more food than many of his children will have to eat tonght.

    Is it wrong to standup for the 98lb weeklings even if it means that your Polo shirt gets torn? If we cannot stand up for the poor, huddled masses, who will?


  5. Dead is dead, whether at the hands of Saddam, insurgents, or the U.S. I know that war is hell, but if we are there to save these people from this despicable ruler, but they are still dying, what have we accomplished?

    Actually it's simplistic thought like "dead is dead' that help justify horrible strategic decisions.

    Here's the reality of the situation:

    1. The past: Saddam is murdering hundreds of thousands of people, mostly political dissidents.

    2. Recently: We went into Iraq and DESTROYED their ability to police and defend themselves. Many civilians were killed. Unfortunate, but such an action is neccessary to take control of a country and minimize US losses. The alternatives were keep #1, or suffer the casualties ourselves in a protracted ground war.

    3. The present: Small factions that would ordinarliy be crushed in a stable political climate (free or dictatorial) are now able to operate. They are fighting (and killing) for control of the country. If they get it, mayhem will ensue (i.e. Darfur). Such is always expected in an unstable state. Why do they attack US forces? Because they NEED us to leave now. If we stay and establish law & order, they will be crushed. FWIW, one of these "factions" is Al Quaeda.

    4. The future: What happens next? Chaos or law & order? Can it be accomplished and by whom?

    People were dying in mass. People are dying in mass. And unless the situation changes, people will continue dying in mass. Obviously who is doing the killing is immensely important as only one the players plans to kill for awhile and stop. All the other players plan to keep killing as long as it serves their own interests.


  6. If the payoff isn’t obvious and predictable, the rational thing to do is pull out and minimize troop casualties. Any other path is just guessing.

    Sometimes the payoff is not progress but rather damage control. Look back at history and see how many countries were invaded and then collapsed into a worse state of affairs after the invaders pulled out to soon.

    Afghanistan is one.

    Germany is another.

    And although we didn't technically invade the Soviet Union, we were instrumental in it's downfall. And we did nothing afterwards to stabilize them. The result is much unrest in the former soviet states as the power vacuum taht was left behind was often filled by dictators.


  7. Poor planning

    Poor planning, poor planning poor planning

    VERY POOR PLANNING

    All right Mr. Rumsfield, what would you have done?

    God Bless America and our wonderful troops

    Yep, I don't have time to waste on all this war crap, I've got to get back to waxing my SUV and cleaning my pool. God bless America and screw all those brown people. Hell, they are poor as dirt anyway. Let 'em kill one another off and then we'll take their land.

    Democrats = party of the common man My Ass!


  8. It was for WMD's, which they didn't find anything. Just a lot of political BS.

    Let me follow your logic. Based on the information I have from a credible source, I come to your house to serve a search warrant for drugs. I kick in the door in, tear apart your house, and only find minimal evidence. However, I do find 12 children gagged, bound, and being tortured in the basement.

    According to your logic since my warrant was for drugs I should just leave, forget about the damage, and pretend I saw nothing. To do otherwise is "Just a lot of political BS".


  9. Not to flame anyone - but anyone who believes in this war should get their head examined

    That would be me and I am greateful to you for letting me know. I had no idea I was such a complete fool.

    it's been one total utter failure.

    Skipped out on history class, eh?

    And what I don't appreciate, is how the Conservative Right portrayed anyone who has dissented on the war as somehow not supporting our troops!?!

    I'm terribly sorry that you are unappreciative. But the support the troops effort was a pre-emptive strike to prevent the kind of ungrateful attitudes and general disrespect for the military that was pervasive after Vietnam. Love or hate the war, "I support the troops" was a brilliant PR move.

    I don't know one Democrat who doesn't support our troops

    Is you TV and radio broken? Just in caseit is, I'll throw out the name of Hillary Clinton...

    you don't set war policy based on casualities, if this war is a total mess and we should pull out as recommended by several reports, then casualites or not - we should pull out.

    Let me follow you this: "You don't set war policy based on casualities". But we need to pull out because this war is a "total mess". What exactly is the total mess you speak of; that our boys are dying? If so, I would remind you that "you don't set war policy based on casualities". Is the total mess that we are unsuccessful in achieveing victory? Perhaps we need more people on the ground. But we can't do that because more people will die. Oh wait, I almost forgot "you don't set war policy based on casualities"

    As of yet no one has ever given me a good reason why we should be in Iraq

    1. 300,000 tortured and dead.

    2. Whole villages of women and childen gassed.

    3. Rape rooms.

    they were better under Saddam, sad as that may sound.

    Dan that's not sad, that is just plain stupid.

    they are incomprehendable, and we shouldn't try and figure them out

    Now that doesn't sound at all bigotted...

    we are not accomplishing by being in Iraq other than losing more of our boys, more civil war casualties, and more tax money squandered. There wasn't this bloodshed when Saddam was in charge.

    1. No bloodshed? Yes, there was. Quite a bit of in fact. It was just kept out of the media. I would suggest that you spend a little time on sites like http://www.9neesan.com/massgraves/ before you continue posting BS like that.

    2. Please reconcile these two statements for me:

    A - "we are not accomplishing by being in Iraq other than losing more of our boys, more civil war casualties"

    B - "You don't set war policy based on casualities"


  10. Tom, like Phil says all you need is a high pressure "T", three couplers, and a short high pressure hose to join your machine into the T on your other machine. Run both machines into one hose to make your new monster. I haven't seen any 9.5 nozzles, so just get 9gpm and 10gpm nozzles and try them both out if you want.

    One more thing. You have to hold to trigger gun when starting your machines so you will not to build up pressure in the hose.

    Yep. I skip the short hose and just spool some hose off each reel.

    Go with a 9gpm nozzle. You'll get some prressure losses. I actually questimate 8.5gpm from my 5.5+4 based on pressure and orifice size.

    As for holding the trigger, it's not an issue for me, but I keep 250ft on hose on each reel.


  11. Dont use the word BBS when searching. It's a hangover to (good ole) days gone past. Use the word "discussion" or "forum" as in "Pressure washing discussion".

    Also, query with the top BBS softwares (VBulletin, YaBB, etc) in the KW string. As in "Pressure washing discussion vBulletin".


  12. I would agree that leasing is better, do I do it? No…… I too like the idea of purchasing new used equipment for 10cents on the dollar.

    If I purchased new I would lease. Most definitely.

    Why don't you buy the used equipment for 10c/$ and leases it to yourself. That way the $$$ for the lease comes back to you w/o SE tax attached.


  13. I would talk to my accountant, because what is best for one person is not necessarily best for another.

    BTW, When I bought two new machines a couple of months ago, she said cash.

    Scott's right on. It's very personal and you need to consider taxes, interest, and cash flow. I have borrowed for things I could have paid cash for because I wanted that cash there in case an opportunity arose that could not be financed.

    An example: Philip has 6K. A new skid is 6k. Interest rate is 9%, CD's are paying 5.5%. Pay cash, right? Maybe. What if your truck blows up next week and you need a new engine (6k). Joe's garage doesn't finance, so you have to take out a new unsecured loan at 11%. Should have financed the skid... And there are other just as likely scenarios that would dictate that you pay cash.


  14. If you can, look into paying bi-weekly. 26 payments = 13 months. And 1/2 your payment was made 2 weeks earlier, so your interest bearing debt was reduced earlier. Over time, paying bi-weekly will save you years.

    Just don't let your morgator scam you into paying a few hundred bucks for the "priviledge" of setting up bi-weekly. Many good mort companies offer it for free, many try and rip you off. If they try that crap, just send 'em more each month like you planned. Just make SURE and send two seperate checks. One for the regular payment, and one for the overpayment marked for principal. Otherwise they will either screw it up or apply it to work against you.


  15. For those that suffer from plantar fasciatis (heel spurs), keep a 2 liter coke bottle full of water in the freezer. Pull it out and roll the bottle under the arch of your for for 10-15 min a night. Works wonders for relieving pain and getting you back to normal.

    Speaking of "itis". An "itis" is an inflamation. The inflamation aggravates the injury and causes much of the pain. In these cases, regular doses of an anti-anflamatory (like ibuprofen) can speed recovery. So, taking it every XX hours as recommended is generally much better for recovery than taking it only when it hurts. Be aware that many anti inflamatories inhibit clotting, as you should be aware of that should you get injured. Also, consult a doctor before starting a prolonged/heavy NSAID regimen.


  16. I copied in an article that I ran across about WD-40. It has many uses as you can see. Has anyone used it to help protect their couplers, nozzles and injectors from corrosion. It seems to me it can't hurt after you have rinsed everything off.

    I use DOW-111 for couplers and such. Waterproof, safe to 400^F, lubricates like crazy. $12/tube at NAPA.

    I do not like WD40 for carpenter bees as it can stain the wood. I use brake aprts cleaner. Dead in seconds, no residue. Great for black widows as well.


  17. The start ofthis thread mentioned chemicals that weakened bleach, and has quickly turned into a discussion of those that boost it's power. Just for clarity, I'd like say one thing about weakening bleach:

    The property of mixing/interacting properly with sodium hypochlorite is called "bleach stable" Some chemicals (like laundry detergent, engineered PW soaps) are specifically designed to be bleach stable. Being bleach stable does not mean that it has a positive effect on the mixture. For example, water is bleach stable but serves no purpose except to dilute the bleach.

    Other chemicals are not bleach stable, which means they will be oxidized by the bleach. The oxidation consumes the bleach, and the chemical, "weakening" both. In reality, you are destroying both but there is usually much more bleach than soap so you end up with a weakened bleach mix. Not being bleach stable does not mean that the interaction with bleach is a violent one. For example, cotton is not bleach stable.


  18. I asnwered 60k, but that is if I'm selling and others are working. If I am the labor and the sales, it quickly shoots over $120k. Also note that my OdorDestroyer.com website takes in quite a bit with minimal time comittment. If that did not exist, my answer would have been much higher.

    FWIW, I left a job I loved and management/corp structure that I hated. Hence, this business is a bit of a paradox for me. I do not like the "work" nearly as much as I did before, but I like the management (customer, me) much better. It was time for a change and this was it. Will I be doing this in 5 years? Only of the money is excellent. Even then, I will likely build it and sell it.


  19. Yes, taxes are going to get raised to pay for the spending and tax cuts the republicans made over the years but at least in the end there will be a 'Balanced' budget and the deficit will be reduced in the process.

    That was sarcasm, right? You don't actually believe that?!?

    Look at history. Tax cuts spur growth, increase revenue, and hence, increase tax revenues. Tax increases decrease revenues. The deficit problem is (and always has been) a spending problem. Democrats have never been able to control spending (too many entitlements), and the Republicans have forgotten the aren't democrats. The only difference between them now is what the money is spent on.

    Bill Clintons tax increases were like slamming ephedrine and Mountain Dew. A temporary dramatic lift, but a long term crash. Balancing the budget is short term. Reducing the debt is long term. Healthy debt reduction is like dieting. It must be done slow and well to be healthy. Cut fat, increase metabolism. The fat is obvious, the metabolism is capitalism. To increase your metabolism, lift the burdens from capitalism.

×